The Pros and Cons of nationwide written test
nationwide written test becomes the hot theme in most of discussions. Though the Supreme Court has turned down an appeal by the go-vernment on the organization of the nationwide written tests, the controversy over whether it is essential to sustain the nationwide exams (UN) has proceeded. Some arguments encompass the primary questions such as; does the quality of Indonesia learning count on the national exam?, will the value of the Indonesian learning system make poorer without natipnal written test?
People, who support the nationwide exam interpret that the value of the Indonesia learning system will fall without the national exam, so they try to fight back the present system.
Hoever there are persons who disagree with the opinion. Those who against this nationwide written test kept in our high school learning state that it doesn't need the nationwide written tests because the quality of learning does not just depend on the national written test. Further, the nationwide exam only measures a small piece of students' competence in specific topics, and does not assess students' competences all through the semester.
In fact, the nationwide examination can still be helpful as an instrument to assess or detect the level of students' cognitive competence in several topics, on a national scale.
No comments:
Post a Comment